468x60

'

Tuesday, 10 January 2012

William Laud



Today we commemorate the former Archbishop of Canterbury William Laud , the main religious advisor to King Charles the Martyr, who though not a Saint, was martyred for reforming the Church with its catholic tradition in mind and for opposing the Puritans.

Laud didn’t oppose the Puritans because he opposed true Christianity, but rather because he believed that the true Christian faith of England was a succession of the early church of Saint Alban and Edward the Confessor, a successor to the mediaeval church of Thomas Becket and Hugh of Lincoln and indeed a successor to the church of Henry VIII... he believed that rather than destroying our heritage and past as though it never happened,  in the mistaken belief that such tradition somehow diminishes Scripture, we should cherish it and learn from it as a complement to Scriptural truth.  

In a time of open rebellion he boldly declared the unity of Church and State, and urged the people to recognise the King as the Supreme Governor of the Church in England. He called the people to repentance and reminded those in Holy Orders (Deacon, Priest and Bishop) of their Godly duties, and he reminded people of the centrality of the Eucharist in the Christian’s life. It was this emphasis on the Eucharist, which would prove to cause men to conspire against Laud, because he asserted that the service should be treated with reverence and respect. By moving the table back to the east wall in churches and by setting up altar rails and by supporting the wearing of the surplice the Puritans felt he was too close to Rome and someone to be opposed.

Though in serving those prominent within Puritan circles with harsh sentences for non-conformity Laud did not do so on the basis of social standing, rather his role was to safeguard the church and he did so regardless of the status or wealth of the defendant and he only did so only after feeling that all reasoning with such men was useless and legal action was the last resort. The idea of an Archbishop judging those who break the law of the church in legal courts may seem strange, but such things were indicative of the times in which he lived.

Realising the Parliament had been usurped by a dictator in the form of Cromwell, Laud campaigned to have the Church separated from the puritan politics of the long parliament which sought to tear down the Church and remake Christianity in their own image.  

For defending the rights of the ordinary lay man in spite of the rich landowners and parliamentarians, and for being an honest and devout Anglican, who stood in defence of the historic Christian faith and the King of England, Laud was condemned by Cromwell and his cohorts in 1640, and foretelling the fate of the Supreme Governor of the Church of England King Charles I, was martyred on this day (January) in 1645

 His final words delivered upon the scaffold, prayerfully directed to the God in whom he loved, trusted and devoted his life to, were:  “The Lord receive my soul, and have mercy upon me, and bless this kingdom with peace and charity, that there may not be this effusion of Christian blood amongst them.”

 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 Keep us, O Lord, constant in faith and zealous in witness, that, like thy servant William Laud, we may live in thy fear, die in thy favor, and rest in thy peace; for the sake of Jesus Christ thy Son our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, one God, for ever and ever. Amen.


6 comments:

Pearl of Tyburn said...

Was William Laud the one who administered Anglican Communion to Charles I just before his execution? I found it admirable how Charles refused to eat anything that day because he wanted the communion to be the last thing he recieved his body. Living in Maryland, we do have a connection to King Charles I since he was the monarch who gave Lord Baltimore permission to found the colony as a refuge for Catholics and others seeking religious freedom.

Wandering Pilgrim said...

Hi Pearl!!

William Laud was actually beheaded a couple of weeks before King Charles I, and I think it was the Bishop of London (William Juxon) who administered the last rites and I would presume Charles last communion. Juxon would later (at the restoration of the monarchy) become the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Yes Charles was certainly a saintly figure within Anglicanism, who died honestly for his faith but I'll write more about him on the 30th January (his day).

Have you heard if those in the Ordinariate are allowed to honour Charles as a Saint? After all he did die for the Catholicity of the Church, and without him the episcopacy and catholic ethos would have undoubtedly been stripped from Anglicanism.

Of course another strong link with Maryland and Charles I would be that it is named after's his wife "Henrietta Maria of France", who was the mother of Charles II and James II, and grandmother to Queen Mary II and King William III and also Queen Anne.

Pearl of Tyburn said...

Hi, Wandering Pilgrim!

Thanks for answering my question. I'll have to do some more research on William Laud and the English Civil War.

I'm not sure if Charles I is being honored as saint in the Ordinariate, but I will do my best to find out and let you know! I have a feeling that even if he isn't considered an official "saint", he's probably still be honored as a "martyr" for the Catholicity of religion in England.

If you read through some of the speeches from the Pope when he visited the UK and from the Ordinariate bishops, you'll notice there was a quite a bit of name-dropping going on....David Livingstone, William Wilberforce, and I think even John Wesley? They were given favorable mention as men who lived out the Christian faith admirably. I would think Charles might fit into their category.

Oh, by the way, I was just curious, have you ever watched the 1950's John Wesley? I find some of it quite funny, actually. The redcoat costumes looked like they were made out of the felt, and some of the dialogue was....well...? I'm really suprised the Methodists of the world haven't pooled their resources to make a new and improved version!

Ah, yes! Queen Henrietta Maria was quite instrumental in urging her husband to show leniancy to the Catholics :-)I didn't know she was William III's grandmother. How was she connected to his family? The name of Maryland, of course, has a double meaning: it's in honor of the Queen of England, but it's also in honor of Mary, Queen of Heaven.

God Bless,
Pearl

Pearl of Tyburn said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pearl of Tyburn said...

Sorry, blah! Typo error on the above post! Okay, I'll try again :-)

I recently posted an article on my blog about the Celtic Revival, its connection to neo-Paganism, and the comparison of Christianity with that movement. I'd love an Irishman's comments on this one!

God Bless,
Pearl

Pearl of Tyburn said...

Just in case you didn't get the chance to read the response I posted on my blog, thank you for taking the time to put up your comments on the Celtic Revival article. I look forward to reading a new post on your blog!

Post a Comment