Today we
commemorate the former Archbishop of Canterbury William Laud , the main
religious advisor to King Charles the Martyr, who though not a Saint, was
martyred for reforming the Church with its catholic tradition in mind and for
opposing the Puritans.
Laud didn’t oppose the Puritans
because he opposed true Christianity, but rather because he believed that the
true Christian faith of England was a succession of the early church of Saint
Alban and Edward the Confessor, a successor to the mediaeval church of Thomas
Becket and Hugh of Lincoln and indeed a successor to the church of Henry
VIII... he believed that rather than destroying our heritage and past as though
it never happened, in the mistaken
belief that such tradition somehow diminishes Scripture, we should cherish it
and learn from it as a complement to Scriptural truth.
In a
time of open rebellion he boldly declared the unity of Church and State, and
urged the people to recognise the King as the Supreme Governor of the Church in
England. He called the people to repentance and reminded those in Holy Orders (Deacon,
Priest and Bishop) of their Godly duties, and he reminded people of the centrality
of the Eucharist in the Christian’s life. It was this emphasis on the Eucharist,
which would prove to cause men to conspire against Laud, because he asserted
that the service should be treated with reverence and respect. By moving the table
back to the east wall in churches and by setting up altar rails and by
supporting the wearing of the surplice the Puritans felt he was too close to
Rome and someone to be opposed.
Though
in serving those prominent within Puritan circles with harsh sentences for non-conformity
Laud did not do so on the basis of social standing, rather his role was to
safeguard the church and he did so regardless of the status or wealth of the
defendant and he only did so only after feeling that all reasoning with such
men was useless and legal action was the last resort. The idea of an Archbishop
judging those who break the law of the church in legal courts may seem strange,
but such things were indicative of the times in which he lived.
Realising
the Parliament had been usurped by a dictator in the form of Cromwell, Laud
campaigned to have the Church separated from the puritan politics of the long
parliament which sought to tear down the Church and remake Christianity in
their own image.
For
defending the rights of the ordinary lay man in spite of the rich landowners
and parliamentarians, and for being an honest and devout Anglican, who stood in
defence of the historic Christian faith and the King of England, Laud was
condemned by Cromwell and his cohorts in 1640, and foretelling the fate of the
Supreme Governor of the Church of England King Charles I, was martyred on this
day (January) in 1645
His final words delivered upon the scaffold,
prayerfully directed to the God in whom he loved, trusted and devoted his life
to, were: “The Lord receive my soul, and
have mercy upon me, and bless this kingdom with peace and charity, that there
may not be this effusion of Christian blood amongst them.”
Keep us, O Lord, constant in faith and
zealous in witness, that, like thy servant William Laud, we may live in thy
fear, die in thy favor, and rest in thy peace; for the sake of Jesus Christ thy
Son our Lord, who liveth and reigneth with thee and the Holy Spirit, one God,
for ever and ever. Amen.


6 comments:
Was William Laud the one who administered Anglican Communion to Charles I just before his execution? I found it admirable how Charles refused to eat anything that day because he wanted the communion to be the last thing he recieved his body. Living in Maryland, we do have a connection to King Charles I since he was the monarch who gave Lord Baltimore permission to found the colony as a refuge for Catholics and others seeking religious freedom.
Hi Pearl!!
William Laud was actually beheaded a couple of weeks before King Charles I, and I think it was the Bishop of London (William Juxon) who administered the last rites and I would presume Charles last communion. Juxon would later (at the restoration of the monarchy) become the Archbishop of Canterbury.
Yes Charles was certainly a saintly figure within Anglicanism, who died honestly for his faith but I'll write more about him on the 30th January (his day).
Have you heard if those in the Ordinariate are allowed to honour Charles as a Saint? After all he did die for the Catholicity of the Church, and without him the episcopacy and catholic ethos would have undoubtedly been stripped from Anglicanism.
Of course another strong link with Maryland and Charles I would be that it is named after's his wife "Henrietta Maria of France", who was the mother of Charles II and James II, and grandmother to Queen Mary II and King William III and also Queen Anne.
Hi, Wandering Pilgrim!
Thanks for answering my question. I'll have to do some more research on William Laud and the English Civil War.
I'm not sure if Charles I is being honored as saint in the Ordinariate, but I will do my best to find out and let you know! I have a feeling that even if he isn't considered an official "saint", he's probably still be honored as a "martyr" for the Catholicity of religion in England.
If you read through some of the speeches from the Pope when he visited the UK and from the Ordinariate bishops, you'll notice there was a quite a bit of name-dropping going on....David Livingstone, William Wilberforce, and I think even John Wesley? They were given favorable mention as men who lived out the Christian faith admirably. I would think Charles might fit into their category.
Oh, by the way, I was just curious, have you ever watched the 1950's John Wesley? I find some of it quite funny, actually. The redcoat costumes looked like they were made out of the felt, and some of the dialogue was....well...? I'm really suprised the Methodists of the world haven't pooled their resources to make a new and improved version!
Ah, yes! Queen Henrietta Maria was quite instrumental in urging her husband to show leniancy to the Catholics :-)I didn't know she was William III's grandmother. How was she connected to his family? The name of Maryland, of course, has a double meaning: it's in honor of the Queen of England, but it's also in honor of Mary, Queen of Heaven.
God Bless,
Pearl
Sorry, blah! Typo error on the above post! Okay, I'll try again :-)
I recently posted an article on my blog about the Celtic Revival, its connection to neo-Paganism, and the comparison of Christianity with that movement. I'd love an Irishman's comments on this one!
God Bless,
Pearl
Just in case you didn't get the chance to read the response I posted on my blog, thank you for taking the time to put up your comments on the Celtic Revival article. I look forward to reading a new post on your blog!
Post a Comment